<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think about Author House buying IUniverse?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:59:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne DiVita</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-25706</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne DiVita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-25706</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... we do NOT use Ingrams or Lightning Source or Color Centric. We work with an independent printer that understands POD. We are personally involved in every book that gets created at our company and work hand in hand with authors to help market their work. I published with Author House when they were 1st Books and was so appalled at the lack of customer service, and the discovery that my book was printed in my home town, that I opened my own POD firm, and we do very nicely, because we put clients first.

We sell books through Amazon because a whole lot of people go there to buy books. But, we are also very successful at having our authors push sales through our bookstore - where their royalty is much higher. 

The one thing about Amazon that works for me is -- they don&#039;t take returns. Since we don&#039;t take returns, that works for me. The traditional publishing world is gradually noticing that POD firms don&#039;t have to warehouse and grind books to pulp. And, our books never have to go out of print.

So, Amazon is helping kill the return system, which is the only reason physical bookstores don&#039;t carry POD books. Once the return system is dead... we&#039;ll be in all the bookstores. Or, everything will be online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; we do NOT use Ingrams or Lightning Source or Color Centric. We work with an independent printer that understands POD. We are personally involved in every book that gets created at our company and work hand in hand with authors to help market their work. I published with Author House when they were 1st Books and was so appalled at the lack of customer service, and the discovery that my book was printed in my home town, that I opened my own POD firm, and we do very nicely, because we put clients first.</p>
<p>We sell books through Amazon because a whole lot of people go there to buy books. But, we are also very successful at having our authors push sales through our bookstore &#8211; where their royalty is much higher. </p>
<p>The one thing about Amazon that works for me is &#8212; they don&#8217;t take returns. Since we don&#8217;t take returns, that works for me. The traditional publishing world is gradually noticing that POD firms don&#8217;t have to warehouse and grind books to pulp. And, our books never have to go out of print.</p>
<p>So, Amazon is helping kill the return system, which is the only reason physical bookstores don&#8217;t carry POD books. Once the return system is dead&#8230; we&#8217;ll be in all the bookstores. Or, everything will be online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Jane Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jane Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-24220</guid>
		<description>Dear Ron,
 My second book is finally out! I used Author House again. This time, I was not given the same rep to assist me through the process. Things were confused because of it. I felt that the new rep didn&#039;t care about me at all. They have a huge turnover rate as the old rep had left. Everytime you call, you get a new person.
 My cover was an ordeal. I spent a good amount of time explaining to the &quot;design team&quot; faxing them examples of simple ideas I had for the cover. I then find out it was too complicated for them. ( a simple sketch artist was needed. ) 
I was told to hire my own cover designer. I did. I received no compensation for this. They wern&#039;t even planning on going to plan B. 
 When I asked for compensation of a measly $100.00 credit, I was told by my rep,&quot; No Way&quot;. I tried to go over his head to no avail.
 I also was told by him to &quot;send in my manuscript  &#039;as is&#039; and they will fix the mistakes.&quot; (I  had already hired an editor but I did have errors and hoped a simple word processor could fix it all. It cost me almost $500.00 more! )
I must insist these were my mistakes because my independent editor bailed too soon. 
I will say that had a great young lady work very hard for me at Author House to correct my mistakes. (Actually, I don&#039;t know why she didn&#039;t come over and shoot me.) They were Russian and southern dialect issues. She was patient and professional.
 Finally, I was told by Author House that they &quot;found&quot; some original notes from a person I spoke to from the creative team . ( He probably had quit .) I  had asked for a slightly smaller book and other minor features such as clip artwork over the chapter numbers.
 I was given the option of waiting two more weeks to re- edit the entire book because the format as well as the cover would be altered  size wise or go with the standard POD size and forgo the clip art. I went with the latter because I was so tired from all of this.
Last but not least: My book came out for sale with Authror ouse before I ever proofed it!
 Will I use Author House again?  NOT UNLESS I GET 
CREDIT FROM ALL OF THESE MISHAPS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ron,<br />
 My second book is finally out! I used Author House again. This time, I was not given the same rep to assist me through the process. Things were confused because of it. I felt that the new rep didn&#8217;t care about me at all. They have a huge turnover rate as the old rep had left. Everytime you call, you get a new person.<br />
 My cover was an ordeal. I spent a good amount of time explaining to the &#8220;design team&#8221; faxing them examples of simple ideas I had for the cover. I then find out it was too complicated for them. ( a simple sketch artist was needed. )<br />
I was told to hire my own cover designer. I did. I received no compensation for this. They wern&#8217;t even planning on going to plan B.<br />
 When I asked for compensation of a measly $100.00 credit, I was told by my rep,&#8221; No Way&#8221;. I tried to go over his head to no avail.<br />
 I also was told by him to &#8220;send in my manuscript  &#8216;as is&#8217; and they will fix the mistakes.&#8221; (I  had already hired an editor but I did have errors and hoped a simple word processor could fix it all. It cost me almost $500.00 more! )<br />
I must insist these were my mistakes because my independent editor bailed too soon.<br />
I will say that had a great young lady work very hard for me at Author House to correct my mistakes. (Actually, I don&#8217;t know why she didn&#8217;t come over and shoot me.) They were Russian and southern dialect issues. She was patient and professional.<br />
 Finally, I was told by Author House that they &#8220;found&#8221; some original notes from a person I spoke to from the creative team . ( He probably had quit .) I  had asked for a slightly smaller book and other minor features such as clip artwork over the chapter numbers.<br />
 I was given the option of waiting two more weeks to re- edit the entire book because the format as well as the cover would be altered  size wise or go with the standard POD size and forgo the clip art. I went with the latter because I was so tired from all of this.<br />
Last but not least: My book came out for sale with Authror ouse before I ever proofed it!<br />
 Will I use Author House again?  NOT UNLESS I GET<br />
CREDIT FROM ALL OF THESE MISHAPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Britt</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-22215</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-22215</guid>
		<description>Ron, I think the merger is a good thing, I blogged about this very topic on http://tombritt.com. The self-publishing (not vanity/subsidy press) industry has come a long way and the long-term stakes are high. Look at AuthorHouse&#039;s http://wordclay.com and compare it to lulu.com or createspace.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, I think the merger is a good thing, I blogged about this very topic on <a href="http://tombritt.com" rel="nofollow">http://tombritt.com</a>. The self-publishing (not vanity/subsidy press) industry has come a long way and the long-term stakes are high. Look at AuthorHouse&#8217;s <a href="http://wordclay.com" rel="nofollow">http://wordclay.com</a> and compare it to lulu.com or createspace.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Jane Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-21000</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Jane Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-21000</guid>
		<description>Dear Ron,
  I so admire your tenacity regarding this complicated field. I think that you do a temendous service to writers everywhere!
 I have published with Author House twice and am quite pleased with the quality of work they do. I Universe and Author House will make a very good team. They both do superior work. I have been disappointed in Lulu mainly because they are so complicated. 
 But, heck,what do I know? This business is so complicated and cut-throat, I am surprised that anything gets accomplished at all. 
The advice I can render to anyone who wants to write is don&#039;t quit your day job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ron,<br />
  I so admire your tenacity regarding this complicated field. I think that you do a temendous service to writers everywhere!<br />
 I have published with Author House twice and am quite pleased with the quality of work they do. I Universe and Author House will make a very good team. They both do superior work. I have been disappointed in Lulu mainly because they are so complicated.<br />
 But, heck,what do I know? This business is so complicated and cut-throat, I am surprised that anything gets accomplished at all.<br />
The advice I can render to anyone who wants to write is don&#8217;t quit your day job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-18538</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-18538</guid>
		<description>I write for a very small niche audience, and so publishing 500 copies of anything and keeping them on hand, would be ridiculous for me.  In most cases your advice is great, if I were making mainstream material, I could move the stock at conventions, or online outlets that sell to &#039;everyone&#039;; but the nature of the material I create, limits me on that front.  Also, I&#039;m a known author in the field of the ‘certain erotica’ I write, and most who’ve bought my work have done so through Amazon—this is why LuLu wouldn’t work for me because my market doesn’t shop there.  ^_^  

As for why I’m self-publishing: I&#039;m trying to produce work that comes from me, and not made for my publishers [I still love them, and work for them, but I&#039;m essentially writing for their market goals, and not always my creative ones. ^_-] 

Thanks you for your advice though.  I find your articles very helpful, including this one!  I&#039;ve spoken to one young man at Createspace so far [trying to hammer out the details on a graphic novel submission] so I think it&#039;s going to be trial and error, and hope they get it right in at least &#039;two proofs&#039;.  I’ve found, through dealings with my publishers that with graphic novels, even the offset printers run them through a rigorous and pricey proofing process until &#039;everyone&#039; gets it right.  I&#039;m used to digital pre-press being very important with my publishers, before it even makes it to the printer; this helps them reduce the possibility of returns due to quality issues.  Thanks for heads up about their &#039;returns&#039; policy.

-Tina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write for a very small niche audience, and so publishing 500 copies of anything and keeping them on hand, would be ridiculous for me.  In most cases your advice is great, if I were making mainstream material, I could move the stock at conventions, or online outlets that sell to &#8216;everyone&#8217;; but the nature of the material I create, limits me on that front.  Also, I&#8217;m a known author in the field of the ‘certain erotica’ I write, and most who’ve bought my work have done so through Amazon—this is why LuLu wouldn’t work for me because my market doesn’t shop there.  ^_^  </p>
<p>As for why I’m self-publishing: I&#8217;m trying to produce work that comes from me, and not made for my publishers [I still love them, and work for them, but I'm essentially writing for their market goals, and not always my creative ones. ^_-] </p>
<p>Thanks you for your advice though.  I find your articles very helpful, including this one!  I&#8217;ve spoken to one young man at Createspace so far [trying to hammer out the details on a graphic novel submission] so I think it&#8217;s going to be trial and error, and hope they get it right in at least &#8216;two proofs&#8217;.  I’ve found, through dealings with my publishers that with graphic novels, even the offset printers run them through a rigorous and pricey proofing process until &#8216;everyone&#8217; gets it right.  I&#8217;m used to digital pre-press being very important with my publishers, before it even makes it to the printer; this helps them reduce the possibility of returns due to quality issues.  Thanks for heads up about their &#8216;returns&#8217; policy.</p>
<p>-Tina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-18536</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-18536</guid>
		<description>About your Createspace experience. ^_^ You got the book, and...how was it? How was the binding? Print quality?

I\&#039;m about to use Createspace in order produce a graphic novel, and then a novel [the mode works for me because I create a certain sort of erotica, and my buying market is primarily centered at Amazon]. I\&#039;m curious about their production values are of interest to me.

^_^
Tina

 

Interesting question. The CreateSpace final product was not bad, for digital printing.  Of the three I tested, Lulu actually had the best quality, followed by CreateSpace (BookSurge) and then by Lightning Source. To be honest, I don\&#039;t associate \&quot;quality\&quot; with any of them.  If I were you, I would try it and order a copy for yourself.  Remember that you sign that you will accept returns with CreateSpace so if your customers are unhappy with the quality, they return the book and it comes out of your pocket. This is the biggest difference between going with CreateSpace vs. Lulu or other LSI reseller. I really think that authors, who are serious about publishing, should print an offset run (500-1000) for their primary sales and only use POD to supplement their other marketing activities.

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About your Createspace experience. ^_^ You got the book, and&#8230;how was it? How was the binding? Print quality?</p>
<p>I\&#8217;m about to use Createspace in order produce a graphic novel, and then a novel [the mode works for me because I create a certain sort of erotica, and my buying market is primarily centered at Amazon]. I\&#8217;m curious about their production values are of interest to me.</p>
<p>^_^<br />
Tina</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Interesting question. The CreateSpace final product was not bad, for digital printing.  Of the three I tested, Lulu actually had the best quality, followed by CreateSpace (BookSurge) and then by Lightning Source. To be honest, I don\&#8217;t associate \&#8221;quality\&#8221; with any of them.  If I were you, I would try it and order a copy for yourself.  Remember that you sign that you will accept returns with CreateSpace so if your customers are unhappy with the quality, they return the book and it comes out of your pocket. This is the biggest difference between going with CreateSpace vs. Lulu or other LSI reseller. I really think that authors, who are serious about publishing, should print an offset run (500-1000) for their primary sales and only use POD to supplement their other marketing activities.</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Neumann</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-18455</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Neumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-18455</guid>
		<description>Ron,
I think you\&#039;ve nailed the merger/acquisition world of POD to a \&quot;T\&quot;. As long as there are people who are wiling to spend their hard earned money on their dream - there are people who are willing to take it. I\&#039;ve done it the hard way three times. The first being with 1stBooks (Author House) and finally totally independent. Being an “indie” is the other option for people who want to self-publish. It’s a lot more work, but in the long run is far less expensive than Author House or iUniverse. I test ran my formula with my latest book, When The Force Isn’t With You and was extremely pleased with both the economics and the result. I would love to share this process with you and your readers if you are interested.
Regards,
Rich Neumann

We would love to hear of your experiences. It\&#039;s a real \&quot;hot button\&quot; subject that needs some realty mixed in with all the hype.

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,<br />
I think you\&#8217;ve nailed the merger/acquisition world of POD to a \&#8221;T\&#8221;. As long as there are people who are wiling to spend their hard earned money on their dream &#8211; there are people who are willing to take it. I\&#8217;ve done it the hard way three times. The first being with 1stBooks (Author House) and finally totally independent. Being an “indie” is the other option for people who want to self-publish. It’s a lot more work, but in the long run is far less expensive than Author House or iUniverse. I test ran my formula with my latest book, When The Force Isn’t With You and was extremely pleased with both the economics and the result. I would love to share this process with you and your readers if you are interested.<br />
Regards,<br />
Rich Neumann</p>
<p>We would love to hear of your experiences. It\&#8217;s a real \&#8221;hot button\&#8221; subject that needs some realty mixed in with all the hype.</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Muyzers</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-18317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Muyzers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-18317</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to answer Mark Probst&#039;s question. Barnes &amp; Noble take their information from Bowker&#039;s listing of books. If you assigned an ISBN to your book, Bowker has the information and Barnes &amp; Noble will start listing your book.  Don&#039;t be shocked, be happy. As this way, your book will get some pre-publication attention and might start generating sales even before it&#039;s even ready!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to answer Mark Probst&#8217;s question. Barnes &amp; Noble take their information from Bowker&#8217;s listing of books. If you assigned an ISBN to your book, Bowker has the information and Barnes &amp; Noble will start listing your book.  Don&#8217;t be shocked, be happy. As this way, your book will get some pre-publication attention and might start generating sales even before it&#8217;s even ready!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-18311</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-18311</guid>
		<description>I think the thing that authors should be leery of is companies that start lying as a practice to spin opinion. It&#039;s very much like what has happened in government as well and it always leads to corrupt practices.  A believable lie is powerful and therefore irresistible to obtain business goals. It’s intellectual bullying.  My point is, if they will lie to gain the simplest of objectives, why would they be a good business partner to you?

Amazon is constantly bending the truth to control opinion on their site. When my first book appeared on Amazon it was listed as a single-run printing that would take several weeks to be received, which was untrue. Infinity was the publisher who has their own printing shop and prints on demand. My experience is they can print and ship much faster than Amazon can.

I sent a letter to Amazon explaining that the listing was deceptive and would hurt sales. It makes people think twice about buying a book that would be “very hard to receive in a timely manner.” They changed the listing to normal shipping times, but added that the book could also be purchased in used format – not true again. All my books are published by Infinity Publishing that prints the books as soon as the electronic order hits their computer. There are no used copies around. This was done to masquerade discounts, I must assume. Used verses discounted sounds better, I guess.

The next thing Amazon did was remove a review a friend of mind made that favored the book. Then when other people that read the books tried to make a review they were blocked, because they hadn’t purchased the book from Amazon even though their criteria for a review was only, “I own the book.” It doesn’t require the purchase from Amazon. I queried them on this practice as well and they lifted the restriction.

The problem lies in the fact that Amazon is now in the publishing business and not just a distribution outlet. Now they feel the need to sway markets. It’s a conflict of interest that leads to deceptive practices. They receive the largest discount of anyone in the publishing chain. They shouldn’t be so greedy. Most authors are lucky to receive 10% of retail, Ingram sees 12 to 20%, and retailers like Amazon see 40%. The rest goes to the original publisher.

It is so slanted against the author that I recommend buyers go to the publisher by all means and avoid Amazon. I receive three times the royalty this way that would otherwise disappear into Amazon. So far I have never seen discounted books from Amazon inside this 40% margin, so they are taking the whole thing unless disguised as used books. All of this is to the disadvantage of the author. I do realize books that have been on the market for a long time have used components and they are listed and distributed by Amazon as such, but brand new books are treated the same way.

Then comes the next wave of bullies on the block – the larger self-publishers that are merging and downsizing, wielding very high costs and complex contracts, getting ever bigger, and owned by big corporations, heading toward shady practices as well, I would predict. How can you justify multiple companies or sub-companies within a corporate entity that all do the exact same job in the same facilities? Does this not smack of some sort of groundwork for deception? Enron was the champion of such practices to hide loses. It makes one wonder.

My whole point of view and advice to authors, since you stand alone, unprotected in the business world, is to avoid these complex entities or you will be taken to the cleaners. There is a movement afoot for self-published authors. Take advantage of it. See AuthorNation.com or NothingBinding.com. The idea is to provide unfettered books to the public at a fair price from the author to the buyer – no monkey business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the thing that authors should be leery of is companies that start lying as a practice to spin opinion. It&#8217;s very much like what has happened in government as well and it always leads to corrupt practices.  A believable lie is powerful and therefore irresistible to obtain business goals. It’s intellectual bullying.  My point is, if they will lie to gain the simplest of objectives, why would they be a good business partner to you?</p>
<p>Amazon is constantly bending the truth to control opinion on their site. When my first book appeared on Amazon it was listed as a single-run printing that would take several weeks to be received, which was untrue. Infinity was the publisher who has their own printing shop and prints on demand. My experience is they can print and ship much faster than Amazon can.</p>
<p>I sent a letter to Amazon explaining that the listing was deceptive and would hurt sales. It makes people think twice about buying a book that would be “very hard to receive in a timely manner.” They changed the listing to normal shipping times, but added that the book could also be purchased in used format – not true again. All my books are published by Infinity Publishing that prints the books as soon as the electronic order hits their computer. There are no used copies around. This was done to masquerade discounts, I must assume. Used verses discounted sounds better, I guess.</p>
<p>The next thing Amazon did was remove a review a friend of mind made that favored the book. Then when other people that read the books tried to make a review they were blocked, because they hadn’t purchased the book from Amazon even though their criteria for a review was only, “I own the book.” It doesn’t require the purchase from Amazon. I queried them on this practice as well and they lifted the restriction.</p>
<p>The problem lies in the fact that Amazon is now in the publishing business and not just a distribution outlet. Now they feel the need to sway markets. It’s a conflict of interest that leads to deceptive practices. They receive the largest discount of anyone in the publishing chain. They shouldn’t be so greedy. Most authors are lucky to receive 10% of retail, Ingram sees 12 to 20%, and retailers like Amazon see 40%. The rest goes to the original publisher.</p>
<p>It is so slanted against the author that I recommend buyers go to the publisher by all means and avoid Amazon. I receive three times the royalty this way that would otherwise disappear into Amazon. So far I have never seen discounted books from Amazon inside this 40% margin, so they are taking the whole thing unless disguised as used books. All of this is to the disadvantage of the author. I do realize books that have been on the market for a long time have used components and they are listed and distributed by Amazon as such, but brand new books are treated the same way.</p>
<p>Then comes the next wave of bullies on the block – the larger self-publishers that are merging and downsizing, wielding very high costs and complex contracts, getting ever bigger, and owned by big corporations, heading toward shady practices as well, I would predict. How can you justify multiple companies or sub-companies within a corporate entity that all do the exact same job in the same facilities? Does this not smack of some sort of groundwork for deception? Enron was the champion of such practices to hide loses. It makes one wonder.</p>
<p>My whole point of view and advice to authors, since you stand alone, unprotected in the business world, is to avoid these complex entities or you will be taken to the cleaners. There is a movement afoot for self-published authors. Take advantage of it. See AuthorNation.com or NothingBinding.com. The idea is to provide unfettered books to the public at a fair price from the author to the buyer – no monkey business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark R. Probst</title>
		<link>http://www.publishingbasics.com/2007/09/20/what-do-you-think-about-author-house-buying-iuniverse/comment-page-1/#comment-18296</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark R. Probst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.selfpublishing.com/?p=217#comment-18296</guid>
		<description>It is interesting to see the results of three POD companies pitted against each other in a true test.  I still think RJ communications gives you the most bang for your buck, that&#039;s why I chose them to print and distribute my upcoming book.  In the earlier comment, Susan mentions her book appearing on Amazon before it went to press, an even stranger thing happened to me:  a couple of weeks after I had assigned an ISBN to my book through Bowker, Barnes and Nobel began listing it available for pre-order at a discount!  It shocked me, considering the book was still being edited at the time and I had no distribution.  Anyone know why this happens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to see the results of three POD companies pitted against each other in a true test.  I still think RJ communications gives you the most bang for your buck, that&#8217;s why I chose them to print and distribute my upcoming book.  In the earlier comment, Susan mentions her book appearing on Amazon before it went to press, an even stranger thing happened to me:  a couple of weeks after I had assigned an ISBN to my book through Bowker, Barnes and Nobel began listing it available for pre-order at a discount!  It shocked me, considering the book was still being edited at the time and I had no distribution.  Anyone know why this happens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

